Arrests made in barrel body case

UPDATE: (September 13, 12:43am PST) The Winnipeg Sun has just published a second article Online concerning the arrests in the Chad Davis case. The article is dated Saturday, September 13 and includes elements that mesh with tips from a source. The tipster’s information–to include information about drugs and a taxi ride–was published in the September 12 article below. It is also worth mentioning here that the September 13 Winnipeg Sun report states that additional arrests are possible.



(This post includes opinion and commentary)

(September 12) Two men are now in custody and charged with murdering a young man whose body was found stuffed inside a barrel pulled from Manitoba’s Lee River in July.

According to a story published today on the Winnipeg Sun’s Web site, “Corey Tymchyshyn, 31, and Kristopher Brincheski, 26, of Winnipeg are in custody” and charged with first-degree murder in the death of Chad Davis (see archives for previous posts on this case).

Davis’s body was found on July 23 after two neighbors pulled the barrel from the Lee River.

On July 26, received information from a source that a “Corey Temptation” might have been the person who killed Davis.

“Temptation” might sound similar to “Tymchyshyn”.

The tone of the information received from the source suggested it was second-hand knowledge; the proverbial “word on the street.”

A precursory Internet search for information on a Corey Temptation turned-up very little information. The name only appeared on a few Web sites that appeared to concern video gaming.

In addition to the name Corey Temptation, the source had also provided with information related to a possible motive for the murder.

Again, we’ll call it “word on the street.” And it may be all wrong.

The source claimed to have heard that “Temptation” had allegedly owed Davis a large sum of money; perhaps as much as $30 thousand. Temptation allegedly contacted Davis in February to arrange a meeting so that Temptation could pay-off the debt and purchase “more drugs.”

Davis, according to what the source had allegedly heard, decided to meet Temptation.

The source said he had heard that Davis had been staying at a hotel when he left to meet Temptation. Davis allegedly took a taxi from the hotel and left several items behind in his hotel room, to include his cell phone and wallet.

The source said he had heard claims that Davis had recently been granted bail regarding cocaine trafficking charges (this is unconfirmed). For this reason–the source claimed–some people felt police weren’t taking Davis’s disappearance very seriously. Others, according to the source, felt Davis had simply left town.

Again, all of the information provided by the source had “the word on the street” tone. It did not appear to come from someone with first-hand knowledge.

On September 7, the Winnipeg Free Press reported that police had recently searched a home regarding a “homicide investigation.” The paper suggested a possible, but unconfirmed, connection to the Davis murder. The paper also mentioned that there were many other unsolved murders in the general area.

The September 7 newspaper report had also stated that a woman in her mid-20s lived in the home with her boyfriend. I wondered if the boyfriend might be named “Corey Temptation”.

The Winnipeg Free Press’s article concluded with the following appeal:

Anyone with information about Davis’ death is asked to call (204) 984-6447 or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477).

It was an interesting story. No confirmation from police that the home search was connected to the Davis case. Yet–despite having reported that there were several unsolved murders in the area–the story concluded with that appeal specifically aimed at assisting the Davis investigation

20 years in TV news has taught me that police and reporters can, in fact, team-up to keep a story alive in the pursuit of new leads for the investigators and, perhaps, a future scoop for the reporter.

And lacking a tangible thread between that home search and Chad Davis’s murder, I had to wonder if that Free Press story was born from such an arrangement.

Putting aside the speculation for the story’s impetus, I felt compelled to call the tip line. I got voice mail and left a careful message without any mention of my source’s name or contact information.

On September 10, I received a call from Constable Brad Parker of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Homicide Unit. Constable Parker explained that he was simply following-up on the tip I had provided. His tone was friendly and low-key.

Not one for burning sources, I would not provide my source’s name or e-mail address. Constable Parker asked if I would inform the source that police would like to speak with him. I agreed to do so.

Constable Parker also asked that I fax him the text of that July 26 e-mail the source had sent me, adding that I could leave out the source’s name and e-mail address. The Constable politely urged me to send it that day.

Minutes after that phone call from Canada, I e-mailed the source and provided him with the constable’s name and phone number. I shared what I had told police and that I’d been careful not to reveal his identity.

I also wrote that I had decided not to send the text of the source’s e-mail without the source’s permission.

Because I hadn’t received a reply from the source, I never faxed anything to police on September 10.

I had received no communication from the source on September 11, either. But, I still felt compelled to provide information that might help police catch a killer.

At 2:37pm (PST) on September 11, I sent a three page fax (including cover letter) to Constable Parker. Rather than provide police with the exact text of the source’s July 26 e-mail, I broke it down into bullet points.

My reluctance for sending the entirety of the source’s text was that it might reveal the writing style of a person already known to investigators.

After sending the fax to Constable Parker on September 11, I called him to confirm that he had received it. I left a voice mail message requesting that he call me or e-mail me in order to confirm that he had received the fax.

The confirmation came one day later (today) at 12:20pm (PST). Constable Parker reached me by phone and said that the fax had been received. I wrapped-up the brief conversation with the familiar request from a reporter, “Could you please give me a heads-up if any arrests are made?”

Constable Parker said he could not do so, but agreed to pass along my request to the primary detectives on the Davis case.

50-minutes after hanging up the phone with Constable Parker I received a Google Alert with a link to today’s article on the Winnipeg Sun’s Web site:

No problem. Either Constable Parker didn’t know about the arrests when he spoke with me less than an hour earlier or he’s very good about “protecting the integrity of an ongoing investigation” (some might add, protecting his job!).

Regardless, what’s important here is that the wheels of justice in a murder investigation move forward. And that a source remain protected.

I strongly suspect investigators were already well down the road to executing their arrests prior to my tip. The information provided by may have meant nothing or it might simply have been icing on the cake for the Davis investigation.

With two suspects now in custody, I will share with you, the reader, the two page letter that I had faxed to Constable Parker just yesterday. I had marked it confidential, but now feel comfortable posting it here as two suspects are in custody.

First, this final thought: As I mentioned in my September 7 post concerning this case, evidence seized in that recent home search (where we now know Corey Tymchyshyn lived) included a refrigerator.

Davis disappeared in February.

Yet, the man who first saw the body stuffed inside the barrel five months later told, “I know an ass when I see one.”

Now, here’s the September 11 letter that I faxed to the RCMP.

5 thoughts on “Arrests made in barrel body case”

  1. Thanks Dino,

    The information came from the September 7 Winnipeg Free Press article regarding the search of the home at “52 Beeston Bay.”

    As you probably know, that article included the following sentence: “A freezer was also removed earlier Friday, one resident said.”

    If I’ve read the article correctly and what you have written above is true, this would appear to mean the resident sourced by the newspaper got it wrong.

    Thanks for your input here.


  2. Just for the record no freezer or refrigerator was removed from the Beeston Avenue residence that was searched.

  3. why havent corey and kris’s photos been posted?????? they were first suspects and then charged the public has a right to see what these two disgusting men look like do we not?????

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap